Collaboration, when done well, is one of the most powerful tools in any organisation. It brings together diverse perspectives, enhances creativity, improves problem-solving, and drives innovation. Effective collaboration allows people to build on each other’s ideas, make better decisions, and generate outcomes that are far superior to what individuals might achieve alone. In the modern workplace, where challenges are complex and interconnected, collaboration has become essential for success. It fosters knowledge sharing, collective learning, and stronger relationships across teams and departments.

However, while collaboration is good—and often necessary—it can become a double-edged sword when taken to excess. This is what experts refer to as collaborative overload, a term highlighted in INTHEBLACK, the CPA Australia magazine (April,2025) [CLICKHERE TO READ], to describe a growing challenge in today’s work environment. Collaborative overload occurs when employees are overburdened by constant meetings, emails, group chats, and shared decision-making, leaving little time for deep, focused work. An article in INTHEBLACK highlights that, in many organisations, these collaborative tasks consume up to 80% of employees' time, leaving minimal opportunity for focused, individual work. ​

Understanding collaborative overload

While collaboration is essential for leveraging collective intelligence and fostering innovation, its overuse can be detrimental. There is need for intentional collaboration, with organisations critically assessing:

• The desired outcomes of collaboration.​
• The appropriate participants to involve.​
• The necessary skills to facilitate effective collaboration.​

Over-collaboration can dilute expertise and slow decision-making processes. As noted in INTHEBLACK, some decisions may be better handled by individuals with deep expertise rather than through collective input, which can sometimes lead to "watered-down" outcomes. ​

What causes collaborative overload?

Several factors contribute to this phenomenon:

• Too many meetings: Without clear agendas or outcomes, meetings can become routine time-wasters that pull people away from meaningful work.
• Communication overload: Employees are bombarded by emails, instant messages, and notifications, often expected to respond immediately. This creates a culture of constant availability and mental fragmentation.
• Inclusion without intention: While inclusivity is important, involving too many people in decisions can slow down processes and dilute the quality of outcomes.
• Lack of role clarity: In team settings, it’s not always clear who is responsible for what. This can lead to duplicated efforts or delays as team members wait for input or consensus.
• Pressure to be visible: In some organisational cultures, being busy—especially visibly busy in collaborative spaces—can be mistaken for being productive.

Strategies to mitigate collaborative overload

To address and prevent collaborative overload, organisations can implement the following strategies:

1. Selective collaboration: Evaluate when collaboration is truly necessary and beneficial. Not all tasks require collective input; some may be more efficiently handled individually.​
2. Structured communication: Establish clear guidelines for meetings and communications to ensure they are purposeful and time-efficient.​
3. Empower decision-making: Encourage individuals with relevant expertise to make decisions autonomously when appropriate, reducing the need for excessive group deliberations.​
4. Foster a culture of trust: Build an environment where employees feel confident in making decisions without constant collaborative input, thereby streamlining workflows.​

By thoughtfully designing collaborative efforts and recognising when individual work is more effective, organisations can enhance productivity and reduce the risk of employee burnout associated with collaborative overload.

Image by freepik

In today’s rapidly evolving workplace, critical thinking has emerged as one of the most essential skills for employees across all industries. The ability to analyse information, make informed decisions, and solve complex problems is no longer just a desirable trait—it’s a necessity. According to the World Economic Forum (WEF), critical thinking is among the top skills that employers are seeking, driven by the increasing complexity of global challenges and the fast pace of technological chang. (FOR MORE DETAILS CLICK HERE)

In an age where artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly shapes decision-making processes and automates routine tasks, the importance of critical thinking has never been more pronounced. While AI excels at analysing vast amounts of data and identifying patterns, it lacks the human ability to interpret context, understand nuanced scenarios, and apply ethical considerations. Critical thinking remains a crucial skill because it empowers individuals to question assumptions, evaluate the credibility of information, and make informed decisions that align with broader organisational goals and societal values. As businesses and industries become more reliant on AI technologies, the ability to critically assess and guide these systems ensures that technology serves human needs rather than dictating them. According to Chalotte Rush “If asked, for example, to analyse data and draw key insights, after you pull the data and review it, you need to make time to sit and process it and think about it, rather than immediately coming to a conclusion…” (CPA, p. 58).

Critical thinking is crucial for addressing the ethical implications of AI, including concerns about bias and fairness. It empowers individuals to evaluate the societal impact of AI technologies, advocate for responsible use, and make informed decisions that consider both the benefits and potential drawbacks of AI applications. By combining AI’s capabilities with human judgment, critical thinking ensures that technology is used ethically and effectively, driving innovation while maintaining a focus on broader societal values.

But what are the five habits for critical thinkers in the business world?

1. Earmark Thinking Time: Designate specific periods for reflection and analysis to thoroughly evaluate information and avoid impulsive decisions.
2. Crush Your Assumptions: Regularly challenge and question your preconceived notions to ensure your conclusions are based on evidence rather than unfounded beliefs.
3. Avoid Confirmation Bias: Actively seek out information that contradicts your current views to achieve a more balanced and objective understanding. When we come up with an idea, we often gravitate towards evidence that is consistent with our existing beliefs and in our haste, we ignore other pertinent information.
4. Invite Diverse Criticism: Encourage feedback from a variety of perspectives to identify blind spots and refine your thinking.
5. Sharpen Your Story: Clearly articulate your ideas and arguments with precision and coherence to enhance their persuasiveness and effectiveness.

And what are the specific examples of critical thinking, as well as some examples of kinds of thinking that would apparently not count as critical thinking? …Critical thinking - A team faces delays in a project and they could blame software tools. However, by evaluating workflows and communication patterns, they uncover that unclear role definitions are the root cause, leading to targeted process improvements rather than unnecessary software changes. Not critical thinking - On-going suspension of judgment in the light of doubt about a possible solution is not critical thinking.

You want to get deeper into critical thinking and be more philosophical? Then consider the relationship of critical thinking to problem solving, decision-making, higher-order thinking, creative thinking, and other recognised types of thinking? One’s answer to this obviously depends on how one defines the terms used. If critical thinking is conceived broadly to cover any careful thinking about any topic for any purpose, then problem solving and decision making will be kinds of critical thinking, if they are done carefully. Historically, ‘critical thinking’ and ‘problem solving’ were two names for the same thing. If critical thinking is conceived more narrowly as consisting solely of appraisal of intellectual products, then it will be disjoint with problem solving and decision making, which are constructive.

Image by freepik

As we reach the midpoint of 2024, Generative AI continues to maintain its influential presence. Take for instance the fact many educational institutions have embraced the integration of AI into their curricula, transforming it from a mere academic influence into a vital educational resource. For example, AI-powered tutoring provides personalised assistance to students, catering to their unique learning preferences and styles. It is anticipated that these systems are poised to recognise moments when students encounter difficulties with concepts and recommend specific resources, challenging the conventional approach of standardised teaching methods.

In a classroom setting, Gen AI is fostering creativity and innovation, including aiding students in coding, crafting music, or even producing art, offering a digital playground for exploration. In a business class setting, we now demonstrate how AI-powered software streamlines repetitive tasks such as data entry and reconciliation, enabling students to focus on higher-order analytical skills. This eliminates the need for demonstrating traditional methods of data entry and reconciliation which typically involve manual input and comparison of financial data, a process susceptible to errors and is time consuming. To see more about how Gen AI can be used in classrooms, refer to TEQSA RESOURCES ON INCORPORATING AI IN YOUR CLASSES HERE

The integration of AI in education is not without its hurdles. The educational system is grappling with issues such as plagiarism and the ethical deployment of AI in classrooms. Generative AI's capacity to compose essays, solve intricate equations, and even produce art has sparked a nuanced debate surrounding academic integrity and the authenticity of students' work. In fact, there is a resistance and apprehension within the academic community regarding this untested technology. Critics voice concerns about Generative AI's potential to diminish critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as well as its tendency to generate misleading or fabricated information. These challenges have ignited discussions on how to pragmatically introduce AI usage in a manner that reinforces, rather than compromises, the principles of educational integrity and the learning journey. In response to these challenges, numerous courses and workshops have emerged, focusing on AI literacy, ethical AI use etc. ALSO SEE TEQSA RESOURCES HERE. These initiatives aim to ensure individuals become active participants in its development rather than passive consumers. Ethical AI courses promote critical thinking, encouraging learners to question both the application and appropriateness of AI technology, fostering a sense of accountability. As we progress, the ethical implications of AI challenge us to consider not only what we can do with technology, but also what we ought to do based on our values.

Academics have undergone a profound transformation, to become guides in a world where information is abundant, but wisdom is scarce. As facilitators of knowledge, in our preparation of students for the realities of the business world, we now play a pivotal role in assisting students in understanding the nuances of AI while simultaneously cultivating essential skills such as critical thinking, creativity, and ethical reasoning.